Prepositional Phrase With The Math Claims

~15~june~2005 :PREPOSITIONAL-PHRASE WITH THE MATH-CLAIMS

 

~1 = ADVERB =modification= no-contract

 

~2 = VERB =action-thinking

 

 

~3 = ADJECTIVE = no-contract =color of the fact

 

 

~4 = PRONOUN =pro=no, no=no, un=no

 

~5 = PREPOSITION =pre=no, position=contract correction: rules,vote, methods

 

~6 = ARTICLE =no-contract =ailing-corruption from the beginning

 

CORRECTION = LODIEO = OWNERSHIP FROM THE BEGINNING, ORIGINAL-JURISDICTION.

 

~7 = NOUN= no-no, correction" "FACT" = KNOWN (WITH A LINE OVER THE "OW". =LODIEO

 

~8 = PAST-TENSE

 

~9 = FUTURE-TENSE

 

~0 = CONJUNCTION

 

5 6 7 5 6 7 2 5 6 7 5 6 7 = :BOTH-WAYS: = 5 6 7 5 6 7 2 5 6 7 5 6 7

 

:PRESENT-TENSE: FOR THE BRIDGE IS OVER THE RIVER. FOR THE RIVER IS UNDER THE BRIDGE.

NOW-INTENT AND CLAIMS-EQUAL = FRONT AND BACK, SAME-BOTH-WAYS

 

 

FOR THE ADVERBS, ADJECTIVES, NOUNS, VERBS ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE MIXING WITH THE CAUSE OF THE FRAUD.

 

 

FOR THE DRIVING OF THE CAR IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRIVER OR FOR THE DRIVER OF THE CAR IS WITH THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE DRIVING.

 

 

5 6 7 5 6 7 2 5 6 7 = 5 6 7 5 6 7 2 5 6 7

 

 

:POSITION IN THE PRESENT-TENSE AND PLANE ARE WITH THE TRUTH [MUST CHECK MATH BOTH WAYS]

 

 

"TO": FUTURE-TENSE AGAINST THE AUTHORITY-JURISDICTION OF THE NOW-TENSE-INJURY

 

[HOW CAN YOU BE CHARGED TO THE FUTURE?]

 

 

"FROM": PAST-TENSE AGAINST THE AUTHORITY-JURISDICTION OF THE NOW-TENSE-INJURY

[HOW CAN YOU BE CHARGED FROM THE PAST?]

 

 

"OVER" AND "UNDER" ARE WITHTHE CLAIM OF THE "OPPOSITE" "AGAINST"=(NO-GAIN) THE QUANTUM AND ON THE DIFFERENT-PLANES

 

 

FIRST-ORDER OF THE OPERATION IS 1 = MULTIPLY, 2 = DIVIDE, 3 = SUBTRACT, 4 = ADD.

 

 

:LAW OF THE CLAIM, 4 + 4 X 4 = 20 = CORRECT

 

 

4 + 6 = 10 | 10 - 6 = 4

 

 

VERB-PRESENT-TENSE = IS, ARE

:COPYCLAIMS/COPYRIGHTS-~JANUARY-~1980-THROUGH-~NOW-TIME BY THE PLENIPOTENTIARY-JUDGE, ~12-~AUGUST-~1999, &: POSTMASTER, &: FEDERAL-JUDGE, &: FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE: 21-~DECEMBER-~2012, PHILIDELPHIA-PENNSILVYNIA, BENJARMAN: FRANKLIN-COUT-OPENING WITH THE NEW-POSTAL-CHARTER, OATH, CONSTITUTION, JUDGES-OATH BY THE David-Wynn: Miller AND: PIOSTMASTER-GENERAL, &: FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-JUDGE: Russell-Jay: Gould.

FOR THESE 80,000-HOURS OF THE PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR and: CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-STUDIES OF THE CORRECT-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-LAW-TRANSLATIONS WITHIN THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-VENUE ARE WITH THE DOCUMENT-CLAIM BY THIS FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE: David-Wynn: Miller &: FEDERAL-POSTAL-JUDGE: Russell-Jay: Gould.

FOR THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR(C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.) OF THIS DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-VENUE IS WITH THESE CLAIMS OF THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-EQUITY-COURT OF THE TWO-OR-MORE-PERSONS WITH THE CONTRACT-VESSEL-CLOSED-DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-COURT-TERMS BY AN ORIGINAL-PAPER-REGISTERED-MAIL-DOCUMENT-VENUE.

FOR THE DOCUMENT-PAPER-VESSEL OF THE QUO-WARRANTO-COMPLAINT IS WITHIN THE CLAIM OF THE PAPER-VESSEL-FEDERAL-POSTAL-COURT-VENUE AS THE CLOSED-AREA-VESSEL-COURT WITH THE TERMS OF THE CONSTITUTION-CONTRACT BETWEEN THESE TWO-OR-MORE-PERSONS WITHIN THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FREDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-COURT-VENUE BY THE WRITTEN-EVIDENCE-BONDED(GLUED, STICH, RIVET)-COURT-COMPLAINT-DOCUMENT.

FOR THE TERMS OF A C.-S.-S.-C.-P.-S.-G.-DOCUMENT-CONTRACT ARE WITH THE TERMS'-CLAIM IN THE DOCUMENT-CONTRACT-FEDERAL-POSTAL-VESSEL-EQUITY-COURT WITH THE VOID OF AN OUTSIDE-CLAIMS BY A FOREIGN-PAPER, FOREIGN-PARSE-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR-FICTION-LAWS, RULES, CODES, OR: REGULATIONS OF THE MODIFICATION-FICTION-PRONOUN-ADVERB-VERB-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, ADVERB-ADJECTIVE-PRONOUN-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, ADVERB-VERB-ADVERB-VERB-ADVERB-VERB-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR, OR ADJECTIVE-PRONOUN-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR BY THE FRAUDULENT-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR.